About Book

This book critically examines the limitations and evolving nature of international peacebuilding. It argues that peacebuilding efforts often fail due to overly rigid liberal paradigms and the assumption that conflicts must be definitively “solved.” Instead, it introduces political unsettlement as a framework—a state where formal peace processes institutionalize political disagreements rather than resolving them entirely. Key discussions include: • Failures of liberal peacebuilding and the shift towards “inclusive peace.” • The concept of formalized political unsettlement, explaining how peace processes can institutionalize rather than eliminate conflict. • The paradox of inclusion, where efforts to involve all stakeholders sometimes reinforce instability. • Alternative peacebuilding strategies that move beyond traditional conflict resolution models. • Creative non-solutions, which recognize that some conflicts persist but can be managed rather than completely resolved. This work challenges conventional peacebuilding approaches, advocating for pragmatic solutions that embrace complexity rather than forcing rigid peace agreements. In today’s world, conflicts are increasingly resistant to traditional resolution mechanisms, making political unsettlement a timely and critical framework. As seen in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Yemen, peace processes often fail because they attempt to impose fixed, liberal-democratic models that do not align with local realities. This book provides a fresh perspective on peacebuilding, relevant for policymakers, mediators, and scholars working in: • Post-war reconstruction and rehabilitation—where formal agreements alone cannot create lasting peace. • Counterterrorism strategies—which often overlook the political grievances fueling extremist movements. • Intercommunal and interfaith conflicts—where sustained dialogue and coexistence are needed rather than forced settlements. • International governance and diplomacy—helping states navigate political unsettlement without imposing rigid solutions. This approach is crucial as global peace processes shift from military interventions toward more sustainable, locally-driven strategies.