About Book

Michael N. Nagler, a leading voice in peace studies, presents The Third Harmony as both a theoretical and practical framework for nonviolence. He argues that humanity’s crises—war, poverty, climate catastrophe, and social fragmentation—stem from an outdated worldview that assumes competition, violence, and scarcity as natural. Nagler introduces a “new story of human nature”: that the universe is purposeful, human beings are inherently spiritual, and collaboration is our default mode of existence. Within this vision, nonviolence is not merely a political strategy but a way of being essential for uniting divided societies. He situates nonviolence at the heart of social transformation, presenting it as the missing element in global discourse about human flourishing and sustainable peace. The book bridges modern science, philosophy, and wisdom traditions to offer a practical, hope-filled roadmap for a nonviolent future. Nagler’s book is highly relevant for today’s fractured world, where violent conflict, ecological crises, and polarization dominate public discourse. Community Engagement Mechanisms include: • Serving as a pedagogical tool in peace education, interfaith dialogue, and social justice curricula. • Inspiring grassroots leaders and activists to frame nonviolence as a transformative worldview rather than a limited tactic. • Guiding community organizations to adopt cooperative models of engagement for conflict resolution. • Encouraging collective reflection on spirituality, science, and ethics as interconnected dimensions of global rehabilitation. This book is a landmark contribution that reframes nonviolence as the core of human identity and destiny. It bridges theory, practice, and spirituality, making it highly suitable for GRACE’s repository in terms of rehabilitation, coexistence, and global harmony Strengths: • Integrates science, spirituality, and social theory into a coherent worldview. • Positions nonviolence as essential for survival in the Anthropocene. • Accessible to scholars, practitioners, and general readers alike. Limitations: • Philosophical tone may require practical supplements (case studies, empirical data) for policy-level engagement. • The “new story” framing, while inspiring, might be critiqued as idealistic without concrete mechanisms of implementation.